https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
556
Journal Of Economy, Technology, and Business (JETBIS)
Volume 2, Number 4 April 2023
p-ISSN 2964-903X; e-ISSN 2962-9330
VALUE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ON THE ARCHITECTURAL WORK OF THE
ARJOSARI MALANG TYPE A TERMINAL REVITALIZATION PROJECT
Shavica Kurnia Meilasari
1
, Wateno Oetomo
2
, Budi Witjaksana
3
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945, Surabaya Indonesia
Email: shavica.ku[email protected]m, wateno@untag-sby.ac.id, budiwitjaksana@untag-sby.ac.id
KEYWORDS:
Value Engineering, Terminal
ABSTRACT
In 2019, the central government made DED Revitalization of Arjosari
Malang Type A Terminal. The Budget Plan (RAB) needed for overall
revitalization is Rp. 80 billion. Then, based on the results of the FY
2024 needs ceiling discussion meeting on January 30, 2023, held in
Jakarta, the RAB for the revitalization of the Arjosari Malang Type A
Terminal is too large and needs to be streamlined again. One of the
work items that can still be cost-efficient is the architectural work item.
Several factors cause the cost of architectural work to be large,
including materials and technology. The use of expensive materials can
increase the cost of an architectural project. Related to the above, value
engineering or value engineering is used with the aim of efficient costs
and looking for alternative alternatives or ideas that aim to produce
costs that are better or lower than the previously planned price. The
results of value engineering on architectural work resulted in savings of
Rp.1,718,085,568 or 8% of the initial cost of the architectural work
project.
INTRODUCTION
Type A Passenger Terminal is one of the assets or infrastructure whose authority is in the
hands of the central government. One of them is Arjosari Terminal (Abreu et al., 2022). The Budget
Plan (RAB) needed for the revitalization of Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal as a whole is Rp. 80
billion. That is a fairly large number and needs to be streamlined again (Yustisia, 2015).
One of the work items that can still be cost-efficient is the architectural work item (Sharif et
al., 2023). In architectural work, the building must also ensure that the building has a clear function
and is designed to be comfortable for its residents. In addition, architectural work must also
determine the external appearance and interior of the building which can affect the image and
aesthetics of the building (Transportation, 2018).
Related to the above, researchers want to research using value engineering or value
engineering (Mahyuddin, 2020). Value engineering is a creative and planned approach with the aim
of identifying and efficiently unnecessary costs (Nandito et al., 2021). Value engineering is used to
look for alternative alternatives or ideas that aim to produce costs that are better or lower than pre-
planned prices with functional constraints and quality of work. Value engineering in building
architectural work is carried out to optimize the value of buildings or architectural projects by
considering factors such as quality, cost, function, aesthetics, and safety (Afriadinir &; Dinariana,
2019).
It is expected that by using value engineering, efficiency can be carried out on RAB DED
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work
Of The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
Terminal Type A Arjosari Malang, and later an efficient building design will be obtained but still in
accordance with applicable regulations and standards.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the application of Value Engineering in architectural
work. To analyze the costs obtained from the application of Value Engineering architectural work
(Andriani, 2018).
Research Benefits
The benefits of the results of this study are expected:
1. As reference material for local agencies that have authority in infrastructure maintenance efforts.
2. Increase knowledge and insight into science for researchers in analyzing quality management.
3. As an additional reference or literature for other researchers related to this study.
Limitations and Scope of Research
The limitation of the problem is done so that the research is not widened and easy to
implement. The limitations of the problem in this study are as follows:
1. The research location was only carried out at Terminal Type A Arjosari Malang.
2. The discussion in this study only includes the evaluation of materials or the replacement of
materials.
RESEARCH METHODS
Value Engineering
Value engineering is an organized and creative approach system that aims to identify costs that
do not provide quality, usability, or something that enlivens a good appearance or the properties
desired by consumers (Rojas & Macías, 2013).
Benefits of Value Engineering
The benefits of value engineering in construction projects are (Kormomolin et al., 2020):
1. Reduce project costs.
2. Reduce wastage of resources.
3. Reduce unnecessary costs.
4. The creation of new creative ideas.
5. The value of the project has become better.
6. Project functions in accordance with the provisions.
7. Save project time.
8. Mitigation of possible project risks
9. Increase work productivity.
10. Get efficient results.
11. Produce Value Engineers experts.
12. Support to decision makers.
Value Engineering Stage
The specific feature of the concept of Value Engineering is an analysis that is carried out
systematically from the beginning of the analysis to obtain the final results that can be accounted
for. These stages are known as the Value Engineering Work Plan. These stages are:
Information stage
This stage is the stage of extracting and collecting information and data needed based on
questions in the value engineering work plan. The data needed includes project data containing
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work Of
The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
558
general project information, project building functions, and project design constraints. Project data
is needed to obtain basic information about a project. Some of the basic principles carried out at the
information stage are to create a breakdown cost model and create a Pareto diagram.
Breakdown Cost Model
The creation of a breakdown cost model aims to sort work items ranging from the highest cost
to the lowest cost and then presented cumulatively. From the breakdown cost model, analysis can
be carried out to determine the limit of the highest-cost work items using the legal basis of
parParetostribution.
Diagram Pareto
The Pareto diagram was invented by Vilfredo Pareto, an economist in the 19th century, and
first used by Joseph Juran. Joseph Juran stated that 80% of the company's problems are the result of
only 20% of causes.
Function Analysis
Function analysis aims to classify the main functions and their supporting functions. From this
classification, a comparison is obtained between costs and the value of benefits needed to produce
the function. The next stage is the function analysis process using the Cost / Worth (C / W) ratio
equation which analyzes the cost of the element with the cost of the element function. Index Function
Analysis = Cost/Worth ........ (2.1) Where cost is the total cost of a work item and worth is a form of
cost that only has a function value to the work item. In the function analysis stage, if the index value
is obtained > 1, then some of these work items have the potential to be carried out via VE
engineering.
Creative stage
At this creative stage, innovation and creativity are needed in processing cost elements that
have the potential to cause loss costs while still referring to the principle of not reducing
performance, quality, benefits, functions, and aesthetics in an element of work chosen in the concept
of value engineering. If several alternatives to the creativity process have been determined, further
analysis can be carried out.
Analysis stage
This stage will be analyzed by the tools that appear. The analysis includes Life Cycle Cost
(LCC) analysis and profit and loss analysis.
Profit and Loss Analysis
In this analysis, the ideas that have been obtained at the creative stage will be arranged with
advantages and disadvantages. Once the gains and losses on each idea or alternative are recorded,
it is then given a rating for each alternative.
Project Life Cycle Cost Analysis
The life cycle of a project consists of six major stages, namely the conception and feasibility
study stages, engineering and design, procurement, construction, initiation, and application as well
as operation or use (Indrastuti &; Mustifany, 2022). After identifying all associated costs by year
and amount then converted into present value, then the costs are added together to get the life cycle
cost
LCC = Initial Cost + Initial Cost + Cost
Therapy + Material Replacement Cost (2.2)
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work
Of The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
Life cycle cost is a way that, at least in theory, has the potential to evaluate construction work.
Recommendation stage
The recommendation stage is the last stage of the value engineering work plan. At this stage,
what is done is to provide recommendations or the best analysis results that will be selected or used.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Information Stage
The following is information about the work that can be used for the application of value
engineering.
a. Job Name: Revitalization Terminal Type A Arjosari Malang
b. Location: Jl. Raden Intan No. 1, Arjosari, Malang City
c. Building Type: Transportation Facility Building
d. Land Area: 28,150 m2
e. Built-up-Area : 7,343 m2
Breakdown Cost Model
In the Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal revitalization project, there are twenty-one jobs for
architectural work. Then identify high-cost items by compiling a Breakdown Cost Model. The
following architectural work is referred to in Table 1.
Table 1
Pekerjaan Arsitektur
No.
Types of Jobs
Price
1
Pack. Wall Pairs 1st Floor
Rp1.680.338.382
2
Pack. Door and Window Frames 1st
Floor
Rp469.479.400
3
Pack. Floor & Wall Coverings 1st
Floor
Rp1.234.816.495
4
Pack. Ceiling &; Hanging 1st Floor
Rp627.568.875
5
Pack. 1st Floor Painting
Rp324.693.090
6
Pek. Sanitary Lt 1
Rp388.348.700
7
Pek. Signage Lt 1
Rp46.971.050
8
Pack. Wall Pair 2nd Floor
Rp1.183.948.054
9
Pack. Door and Window Frames 2nd
Floor
Rp138.106.700
10
Pack. Floor & Wall Coverings 2nd
Floor
Rp649.661.750
11
Pack. Ceiling &; Hanging 2nd Floor
Rp1.081.216.584
12
Pack. 2nd Floor Painting
Rp300.784.672
13
Pek. Sanitary Lt 2
Rp168.401.850
14
Pack. Roof 2nd Floor
Rp1.430.570.168
15
Pek. Signage Lt 2
Rp33.124.000
16
Pack. Exterior Façade
Rp4.668.281.437
17
Pack. Ramp, Stair Railing, and Void
Rp179.900.076
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work Of
The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
560
No.
Types of Jobs
Price
18
Pack. Yard and parking
Rp5.874.614.009
19
Pack. 1st Floor Furniture
Rp316.989.500
20
Pack. 2nd Floor Furniture
Rp548.156.000
21
Pack. Office and Interior Equipment
Rp136.560.000
SUM
IDR 21,482,530,792
Source: Olahan Researcher
From Table 1, a breakdown cost model is then made to determine the highest cost so that
value engineering analysis can be carried out.
Table 2
Breakdown Cost Model
No
Types of Jobs
Price
Total
Percentage
Cumulative
Percentage
1
Pack. Yard and parking
Rp5.874.614.009
27,35%
27,35%
2
Pack. Exterior Façade
Rp4.668.281.437
21,73%
49,08%
3
Pack. Wall Pairs 1st Floor
Rp1.680.338.382
7,82%
56,90%
4
Pack. Roof 2nd Floor
Rp1.430.570.168
6,66%
63,56%
5
Pack. Wall Pair 2nd Floor
Rp1.183.948.054
5,51%
69,07%
6
Pack. Floor & Wall Coverings 1st Floor
Rp1.234.816.495
5,75%
74,82%
7
Pack. Ceiling &; Hanging 2nd Floor
Rp1.081.216.584
5,03%
79,85%
8
Pack. Floor & Wall Coverings 2nd
Floor
Rp649.661.750
3,02%
82,87%
9
Pack. Ceiling &; Hanging 1st Floor
Rp627.568.875
2,92%
85,80%
10
Pack. 2nd Floor Furniture
Rp548.156.000
2,55%
88,35%
11
Pack. Door and Window Frames 1st
Floor
Rp469.479.400
2,19%
90,53%
12
Pek. Sanitary Lt 1
Rp388.348.700
1,81%
92,34%
13
Pack. 1st Floor Painting
Rp324.693.090
1,51%
93,85%
14
Pack. 1st Floor Furniture
Rp316.989.500
1,48%
95,33%
15
Pack. 2nd Floor Painting
Rp300.784.672
1,40%
96,73%
16
Pack. Ramp, Stair Railing and Void
Rp179.900.076
0,84%
97,56%
17
Pek. Sanitary Lt 2
Rp168.401.850
0,78%
98,35%
18
Pack. Door and Window Frames 2nd
Floor
Rp138.106.700
0,64%
98,99%
19
Pack. Office and Interior Equipment
Rp136.560.000
0,64%
99,63%
20
Pek. Signage Lt 1
Rp46.971.050
0,22%
99,85%
21
Pek. Signage Lt 2
Rp33.124.000
0,15%
100,00%
Source: Processed by Researchers
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work
Of The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
Pareto Distribution
From the Breakdown Cost Model listed in Table 2 above, it can be determined the limit of
high-cost work items using the Pareto distribution graph presented in Figure 1.
Gambar 4. 1 Grafik Distribusi Pareto
Source: Processed by Researchers
Based on the graph of the Pareto distribution, a linear regression equation is obtained with the
following formula:
Equation y = -3E-06x
4
+ 0.0008x
3
- 0.0814x
2
+ 3.958x + 12.576
If x = 20% ; so y = 33,35%
If y = 80% ; so x = 65,096%
ΔP = 33,35% - 20% = 13,35%
ΔC = 80% - 65,096% = 33,35%
So ΔC>ΔP
Percentage of the number of work items = 20% + ΔP = 20% + 13,35% = 33,35%
The number of work items that need to be performed value engineering is as many as
= 33,35% x 21
=7,0035 → 7 Work items
So the number of work items that need to be done value engineering is as much as 7 work items.
Function Analysis
After finding the number of high-cost work items, the next step that must be taken is to perform
a function analysis. The following work items will be carried out function analysis starting from the
highest percentage value.
Table 3
Work items to be analyzed functions
No
Types of Jobs
1
Pack. Yard and parking
2
Pack. Exterior Façade
3
Pack. Wall Pairs 1st Floor
4
Pack. Roof 2nd Floor
5
Pack. Wall Pair 2nd Floor
6
Pack. Floor & Wall Coverings 1st Floor
7
Pack. Ceiling &; Hanging 2nd Floor
y = -3E-06x
4
+ 0.0008x
3
- 0.0814x
2
+ 3.958x + 12.576
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
GRAFIK DISTRIBUSI PARETO
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work Of
The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
562
Source: Olahan Researcher
Table 4
Function Analysis (Yard and Parking Works)
Function Analysis
Item: Yard Work and Parking
Function: Create Page
No
Description
Verb
Noun
Cost
Worth
1.
Floor hardener favicon color
Protect
Floor
IDR 52,500
IDR 52,500
2.
Finishin Trowel
Flatten
Floor
IDR 30,000
-
Total
IDR 82,500
IDR 52,500
Cost/Worth
1,57
Source: Olahan Researcher
Table 5
Analisis Fungsi (Wall Cladding ACP)
Function Analysis
Item: Installation of Wall Cladding ACP
Function : Beautify the Outside
No
Description
Verb
Noun
Cost
Worth
1.
Aluminum composite panel 4mm
Beautify
your
Wall
IDR
787,500
IDR 787,500
2.
ACP Galvanized Bracket
Strengthen
Skeleton
IDR 80,000
-
3.
Aluminum composite frame
40x40
Supporting
ACP
IDR
180,000
IDR 180,000
4.
Screw
Bind
Skeleton
IDR 7,680
IDR 7,680
5.
Sealant
Glue
ACP
IDR 56,875
-
Total
IDR
1,112,055
IDR 975,180
Cost/Worth
1,14
Source: Olahan Researcher
Table 6
Function Analysis (Wall Pairs)
Function Analysis
Item : Wall Pair
Function: Limit Room
No
Description
Verb
Noun
Cost
Worth
1.
Light Brick 10cm Thickness
Limiting
Room
IDR 68,940
IDR 68,940
2.
Instant mortar
Glue
Wall
Rp.249
Rp.249
Total
IDR 69,189
IDR 69,189
Cost/Worth
1
Source: Olahan Researcher
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work
Of The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
Table 7
Function Analysis (Roof Covering)
Function Analysis
Item: Roof Cover
Function:
No
Description
Verb
Noun
Cost
Worth
1.
Multiroof sand metal tile roof
0.35mm color
Shut
Building
IDR 62,042
IDR 62,042
2.
Nails/Screws
Connect
Roof
IDR 3,185
IDR 3,185
Total
IDR 65,227
IDR 65,227
Cost/Worth
1
Source: Olahan Researcher
Table 7
Analisis Fungsi (Pasangan Dinding)
Function Analysis
Item : Wall Pair
Function: Limit Room
No
Description
Verb
Noun
Cost
Worth
1.
Light Brick 10cm Thickness
Limiting
Room
IDR 68,940
IDR 68,940
2.
Instant mortar
Glue
Wall
Rp.249
Rp.249
Total
IDR 69,189
IDR 69,189
Cost/Worth
1
Source: Olahan Researcher
Table 8
Analisis Fungsi (Pekerjaan Lantai)
Function Analysis
Item: Floor Work
Function : Footing Base
No
Description
Verb
Noun
Cost
Worth
1.
Homogeneous tile Roman
60x60
Beautify
your
Floor
IDR
212,220
IDR 212,220
2.
Portland Cement
Glue
Ceramics
IDR 12,150
IDR 12,150
3.
Tidal Sand
Glue
Ceramics
IDR 7,713
IDR 7,713
4.
Color Cement
Fill
Ceramic
grout
IDR 28,495
-
Total
IDR
260,578
IDR 232,083
Cost/Worth
1,12
Source: Olahan Researcher
Table 9
Analisis Fungsi (Pekerjaan Plafon)
Function Analysis
Item: Ceiling Work
Function: Beautify the Ceiling
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work Of
The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
564
No
Description
Verb
Noun
Cost
Worth
1.
PVC Ceiling
Cover
Roof
IDR
124,950
IDR 124,950
2.
Adhesive
Glue
Ceiling
IDR 23,761
IDR 23,761
Total
IDR
148,711
IDR 148,711
Cost/Worth
1
Source: Olahan Researcher
From the results of the function analysis above, if a cost/worth ratio is obtained > 1, then some
of these work items have the potential for value engineering. A high cost-to-worth ratio in a work
item indicates that the work item has high cost savings, and will be selected for further analysis. The
work items that the next analysis will carry out are yard and parking work, exterior façade work, and
floor work.
Creativity Stage
In this creative stage, a collection of alternative substitutes for each selected work item from
the information stage is carried out. If several alternatives to the creativity process have been
determined, further analysis can be carried out.
Substitute Alternatives
The alternative substitutes can be reviewed from various aspects. Here is a table of alternate
alternatives for yard work, exterior façade work, and floor work.
Table 10
Alternatives to Yard and Parking Jobs
Alternatives to Yard and Parking Jobs
Work Item: Create a Garden
Function: Green Open Area
Existing
Floor Hardener Cast Concrete Floor
Alternative
1
Planting media, grass, and trees
Source: Processed by Researchers
Table 11
Alternative Replacement of Exterior Façade Work
Alternative Replacement of Exterior Façade Work
Work Item: Pair Wall Cladding ACP
Function: Beautify the Outside
Existing
Wall cladding ACP thickness 4mm
Alternative
1
Wall cladding GRC thickness 4 mm
Alternative
2
Wall cladding woodplank
Source: Olahan Researcher
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work
Of The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
Table 12
Advantages and Disadvantages of Material
No
ACP
GRC
Woodplank
1.
Excess
Resistant to all
weather conditions
Resistant to all
weather conditions
More durable than real
wood
Easy to shape and
apply
Easy to shape and
apply
Anti-termite
Easy maintenance
and maintenance
Easy maintenance
and maintenance
Easy maintenance and
maintenance
Flat and smooth
surface
Flat and smooth
surface
Easy and fast installation
-
Easy and fast
installation
The price is relatively
cheap
-
The price is
relatively cheap
-
2.
Deficiency
The price is
relatively expensive
GRC manufacturing
must go through the
factory, it is difficult
to make manually
without reliable
experts
Can't stand the impact
Requires experts in
the installation
process
Limited availability
in the market
This material is quite
heavy
At high
temperatures, it can
emit toxic gases
-
-
Source: Olahan Researcher
Table 13
Alternative to Floor and Wall Covering Work 1st Floor
Alternative to Floor and Wall Covering Work 1st Floor
Work Item: Floor Pair Work
Function: Footing Base
Existing
Roman tile homogeneous floor 60x60
Alternative
1
Epoxy flooring
Alternative
2
Teak parquet floor 1.2x5x20cm
Source: Olahan Researcher
Table 14
Advantages and Disadvantages of Material
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work Of
The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
566
No
Roman Homogeneous
Flooring
Epoxy Flooring
Teak Wood Parquet
Flooring
1.
Excess
Lots of variety
More elegant and
bright display
The look is more elegant
and natural because of
real wood
Priced
Priced
Easy installation
Easy maintenance
Easy maintenance
Long enough
durability
2.
Deficiency
The texture is classified
as hard
Requires experts
in the installation
process
Need more care because it
is prone to moisture if
exposed to water and
attacked by termites
Does not absorb heat
Difficult to
disassemble
Source: Olahan Researcher
Analysis Phase
At the analysis stage, an analysis will be carried out to determine which design from various
alternatives is the best alternative. To determine the best alternative, a stage will be carried out,
namely the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis stage.
Life Cycle Cost
Life cycle cost analysis is used to calculate alternatives based on cost criteria. In the project
life cycle cost analysis, the variable costs taken into account include initial costs, operational costs,
maintenance costs, and replacement costs. Some of the basic provisions used for this analysis are
the life value of the plan and the value of I (Bank Indonesia deposit interest + risk). Age of plan =
50 years i = Bank Indonesia deposit interest + risk (assumed risk value equals interest). So the value
of i = 5% + 5% = 10% 4.8.1. Life Cycle Cost Work Page.
Table 15
Kesimpulan Biaya Daur Hidup Proyek
Analysis Phase
Project Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Work Item: Yard Work and Parking
Investment Age: 50 Years
MARR: 10%
No
Types of Fees
Initial Design (A0)
Alternative Design
(A1)
1.
Initial Cost
IDR 576,994,272
IDR 741,667,416
2.
Operational Cost
0
0
3.
Maintenance Cost
IDR 572,079,086
IDR 735,349,442
4.
Replacement Cost
0
0
Total Life Cycle Cost
IDR 1,149,073,358
IDR 1,477,016,858
Source: Olahan Researcher
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work
Of The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
Life Cycle Cost of Exterior Facade Work
Table 29
Project Life Cycle Cost Conclusion
Analysis Phase
Project Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Work Item: Exterior Facade Work
Investment Age: 50 Years
MARR: 10%
No
Types of Fees
Initial Design (A0)
Alternative Design (A1)
Alternative Design (A2)
1.
Initial Cost
IDR 1,999,985,847
IDR 562,824,480
IDR 498,898,736
2.
Operational Cost
0
0
0
3.
Maintenance
Cost
IDR 1,982,948,760
IDR 567,660,150
IDR 503,185,170
4.
Replacement
Cost
0
0
0
Total Life Cycle Cost
IDR 3,982,934,607
IDR 1,130,484,630
IDR 1,002,083,906
Source: Olahan Researcher
Life Cycle Cost of Floor Work
Table 16
Kesimpulan Biaya Daur Hidup Proyek
Analysis Phase
Project Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Work Item: Floor Work
Investment Age: 50 Years
MARR: 10%
No
Types of Fees
Initial Design (A0)
Alternative
Design (A1)
Alternative Design
(A2)
1.
Initial Cost
IDR 964,481,871
IDR
525,202,500
IDR 554,613,840
2.
Operational Cost
0
0
0
3.
Maintenance Cost
IDR 956,265,834
IDR
520,728,509
IDR 549,889,306
4.
Replacement Cost
0
0
0
Total Life Cycle Cost
IDR 1,920,747,705
IDR
1,045,931,009
IDR 1,104,503,146
Source: Processed by Researchers
Recommendation Stage
The recommendation stage is the last stage of the value engineering work plan. At this stage,
what is done is to provide recommendations or the best analysis results that will be selected or used.
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work Of
The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
568
So the results of all these analyses are selected as the best alternative that will be used as the final
result of value engineering.
Table 38
Project Life Cycle Cost Conclusion Work Page
Recommendation Stage
Work Item :
Existing
Floor Hardener Cast Concrete Floor
Selected alternatives
Alternative 1:
Garden works (Urugan Land and planting mini
elephant grass)
Cost Savings
Construction Cost Savings:
IDR 576,994,272 – IDR 735.349.442= -
Rp.158.355.170
Total life cycle cost savings:
IDR 1,149,073,358 - IDR 1,477,016,858=
-IDR 327,943,500
Or by -2.7%
Source: Processed by Researchers
Based on Table 38, the alternative chosen was the creation of a park that functioned for
greenery around the terminal area but experienced an increase in construction costs by 28.5%.
Table 39
Exterior Façade Work
Recommendation Stage
Work Item: Exterior Façade
Existing
Wall cladding alumunium composite panel (ACP)
Selected
alternatives
Alternative 1:
Wall cladding Glass Reinforced Concrete (GRC)
Cost Savings
Construction Cost Savings:
Rp.1.999.985.847– Rp. Rp. 562,824,480= IDR
1,437,161,367
Total life cycle cost savings:
IDR 3,982,934,607,- IDR 1,130,484,630= IDR
2,852,449,977
Or 30.78%
Source: Processed by Researchers
Based on Table 4.39, the selected alternative is the replacement of an Aluminum Composite
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work
Of The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
Panel (ACP) with Glass Reinforced Concrete (GRC) and experienced construction cost savings of
71%.
Table 40
Floor Work
Recommendation Stage
Work Item: Floor
Existing
Lantai homogeneous tile Roman 60x60 polish
Selected alternatives
Alternative 1:
Epoxy flooring
Cost Savings
Construction Cost Savings:
IDR 964,481,871 – IDR525,202,500 = IDR
439,279,371
Total life cycle cost savings:
IDR 1,920,747,705 - IDR 1,045,931,009= IDR
874,816,696
Or 35.57%
Source: Processed by Researchers
Based on Table 40, the alternative chosen was the replacement of 60x60 Roman homogeneous
tile ceramics with epoxy flooring and experienced construction cost savings of 45%.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the analysis of the application of value engineering methods in the
architectural work of the Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal revitalization project, obtained From
the results of the value engineering analysis, three work items can be analyzed, namely yard work
and parking where the recommended design alternative is the creation of a park consisting of the
provision of planting media, mini elephant grass and trees less than 15 cm in diameter, then exterior
façade work is recommended replacement of Aluminum Composite Panel (ACP) with Glass
Reinforced Concrete (GRC) and on the floor, work recommended replacement of ceramic
homogeneous tile roman 60x60 polish with epoxy floor, The total cost of architectural work on the
Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal revitalization project becomes Rp.19,764,445,224. Cost savings
of Rp.1,718,085,568 or 8% of the initial cost of work are obtained from architecture. Based on the
analysis and preparation of the final project that has been carried out by the author, there are several
suggestions, namely more knowledge and insight are needed about alternative designs and materials,
and further research is needed to analyze the impact of material replacement on architectural work
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abreu, D. T. M. P., Barraza, J. E. F., Clavijo, M. V, Maturana, M. C., Santos, J. R., Schleder, A. M.,
& Martins, M. R. (2022). Research In System Reliability And Risk Analysis Under
Development At The Naval Architecture And Ocean Engineering Department From the
University Of São Paulo. Ifac-Papersonline, 55(19), 193–198.
Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Ifacol.2022.09.206. Google Scholar
Afriadinir, A., & Dinariana, D. (2019). Analisis Penerapan Value Engineering Pada Proyek
Value Engineering Analysis On The Architectural Work Of
The Arjosari Malang Type A Terminal Revitalization
Project
Vol 2, No 8 August 2023
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
570
Rusunawa Mahasiswa T-24 Palembang. Ikra-Ith Teknologi Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 3(1),
48–58. Google Scholar
Andriani, R. M. (2018). Penerapan Value Engineering Pada Struktur Bangunan Gedung (Studi
Kasus: Proyek Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta). Google Scholar
Indrastuti, I., & Mustifany, R. (2022). Penerapan Value Engineering Untuk Efisiensi Biaya Pada
Proyek Bangunan Gedung (Studi Kasus: Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Variety Restaurant
Batu Batam). Journal Of Civil Engineering And Planning (Jcep), 3(1), 94–101. Google
Scholar
Kormomolin, F., Taihuttu, F., & Kempa, M. (2020). Penerapan Value Engineering Pada
Pembangunan Lahan Parkir Fakultas Teknik Universitas Pattimura Ambon. Jurnal Simetrik,
10(1), 295–301. Google Scholar
Mahyuddin, M. (2020). Analisa Rekayasa Nilai (Value Engineer) Pada Konstruksi Bangunan
Rumah Dinas Puskesmas Karang Jati Balikpapan. Journal Techno Entrepreneur Acta, 5(1).
Google Scholar
Nandito, A., Huda, M., & Siswoyo, S. (2021). Penerapan Value Engineering Pada Proyek
Pembangunan Puskesmas Rego Manggarai Barat Ntt. Axial: Jurnal Rekayasa Dan
Manajemen Konstruksi, 8(3), 171–186. Google Scholar
Perhubungan, K. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor: Km 59 Tahun 2010. Google
Scholar
Rojas, L. A., & Macías, J. A. (2013). Bridging The Gap Between Information Architecture Analysis
And Software Engineering In Interactive Web Application Development. Science Of
Computer Programming, 78(11), 2282–2291.
Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Scico.2012.07.020. Google Scholar
Sharif, M. R., Habib, G., Mahfooz, S., Ali, R., & Ullah, M. K. (2023). Architectural Conservation:
A Case Study Of Multan Jain Swamber Temple. International Journal Of Social Health, 2(5),
265–271. Google Scholar
Yustisia, T. V. (2015). Undang-Undang No 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah Dan
Perubahannya. Visimedia. Google Scholar
licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License