This variable is influenced by the degree to which innovations can be piloted gradually. For
implementers and adopters of innovation, this is by the introduction of innovation to each village
through gradual socialization starting from the Bubakan Health Center to the hamlet level. So that
makes it easier for adopters to accept innovation. and 4) Observability variable: This variable is
influenced by the level of innovation if seen or observed by others. For innovation adopters, this can
be proven by following assistance from cadres and seeing changes that occur in patients so that
innovation adopters have the incentive to accept the PaSar Jiwa innovation. The biggest
encouragement is due to a change in patient attitudes when compared to before participating in PaSar
Jiwa innovation assistance. At this stage of encouragement, there is only one variable that does not
affect that is the complexity variable or the variable caused by the level of difficulty of innovation.
This is because PaSar Jiwa innovation has no difficulty in adoption.
The third stage is the decision stage. At this stage, both parties, both PaSar Jiwa innovation
implementers and adopters have jointly decided to adopt the innovation because of the benefits and
benefits in it. This PaSar Jiwa innovation has also been used partially, therefore innovation can be
accepted faster because the adopters have tried innovations after that decided to accept the
innovation. The fourth stage is the implementation stage. At this stage, the PaSar Jiwa innovation
has been tested to be implemented, although there is still a possibility or uncertainty of the impact
of the implementation of the innovation.
The final stage is the confirmation stage. At this stage, both implementers and adopters of the
innovation have jointly ensured the sustainability of the PaSar Jiwa innovation. By the results of
previous discussions, both parties decided to continue this innovation. The continued use of
innovation is proven by the support and attitudes of implementers and adopters of innovation. In the
previous stage, namely the implementation stage, both implementers and adopters of the innovation
were supported by decisions that had been taken based on encouragement or persuasion and
knowledge at the previous stage.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Arianto, K., & Fitriana, E. N. (2013). Modal sosial dalam kemandirian masyarakat di bidang
kesehatan. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 17(2), 37–49.
Awaludin, M. N., & Sukmono, S. (2020). The Effect of Social Media Marketing and Brand
Awarness on Purchase Decisions With Viral Marketing As Intervening Variables on Janji Jiwa
Coffee Consumers Among Students Using Social Media Area Jabodeta. AFEBI Management
and Business Review, 5(1), 54–68.
Ayuningtyas, D., Rayhani, M., Misnaniarti, M., & Maulidya, A. N. (2018). Implementation of
mental health policies toward Indonesia free restraint. Policy & Governance Review, 2(2), 161–
173.
Burmeister, O. K., & Marks, E. (2016). Rural and remote communities, technology and mental
health recovery. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 14(2), 170–
181.
Crepaz-Keay, D. (2016). Improving mental health in later life: the role of service user involvement.
Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 17(3), 179–188.
GHAFAR, Z., & Cahya, M. N. (2023). Effects Of Technology On Foreign Language Learning And
Its Negative Impacts: An Overview. Jurnal Ekonomi, Teknologi Dan Bisnis (JETBIS), 2(5),
421–429.
Hamzah, D. A. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Rekontruksi Pemikiran Dasar serta Contoh
Penerapan Pada Ilmu Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora. CV Literasi Nusantara Abadi.