https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
691
Journal Of Economics, Technology, and Business (JETBIS)
Volume 3, Number 2 February 2024
p-ISSN 2964-903X; e-ISSN 2962-9330
DOES THE BBN KB INCENTIVE POLICY INCREASE OWNERSHIP OF
BATTERY-BASED ELECTRIC VEHICLES? INDONESIA CASE STUDY
Risza Galas Ramadhan
1
, Khoirunurrofik
2
Universitas Indonesia
KEYWORDS:
Tax Incentives, vehicle
registration fees, Battery
Electric Vehicles, Indonesia
ABSTRACT
Indonesia's commitment by 2060 is to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions and realize net zero emissions. The transition of electric
vehicles in the transportation sector with renewable energy is a
solution to reduce emissions. However, the ownership rate of battery-
based electric vehicles in Indonesia is still low. This study empirically
discusses the effect of the BBN KB incentive policy designed to
encourage ownership of battery-based electric vehicles in Indonesia.
To determine the effect of the BBN KB incentive policy on battery-
based electric vehicle ownership, a Moderated Regression Analysis
(MRA) panel data analysis with Pooled Ordinary Least Square
(POLS) estimation technique is used using secondary data from 34
provinces in Indonesia from 2019-2022. The results of the analysis
found that the BBN KB incentive policy has a significant effect on
increasing ownership of electric vehicles, especially battery-based
electric cars in Indonesia. The factors of the number of charging
infrastructure (SPKLU), consumer awareness, fuel prices, and open
unemployment rates have a significant influence on ownership of
battery-based electric motorized vehicles. Analysis on the island of
Java explains that there is a significant effect on increasing ownership
of battery-based electric car vehicles after the policy is implemented,
while on non-Java island the BBN KB incentive policy shows an
insignificant impact on increasing ownership of battery-based electric
vehicles, especially 4-wheelers.
INTRODUCTION
Climate change has become an international issue in recent years because it poses
multidimensional threats to ecology, the environment, the economy, and society. Global
temperatures are currently estimated to be about 1.20°C above the average temperature in pre-
industrial times (Organization, 2022) and 2022 will be the sixth warmest year since 1880
(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2023). Projections by 2100, even if
emissions are significantly reduced and global warming is kept to less than 2°C, sea levels
could still rise by 30 to 60 centimeters (Affairs, 2022).
One of the main contributors to climate change is greenhouse gas emissions resulting
from various human activities. Four gaseous components, namely carbon dioxide (CO2),
Methane (CH4), Nitrous oxide (N2O), and Fluorinated gases (F-gases), form greenhouse gas
emissions at the global level. CO2 gas is mainly produced from the use of fossil fuels, while
waste incineration, energy use, and biomass burning produce methane gas. In addition,
agricultural activities such as the use of fertilizers generate N2O gas, while F-gases are sourced
due to industrial activities, the use of refrigeration machinery, and other consumer products.
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
Figure 1
Greenhouse Gas Formers
Source: IPCC (2014)
As shown in Figure 1, CO2 is the largest component in the formation of greenhouse gas
emissions with a share of 65% sourced from fossil fuels and industrial processes and 11% from
forest burning processes, so that overall it contributes 76% of the amount of greenhouse gases
created. Therefore, the main focus in efforts to reduce global climate change is to encourage
the reduction of CO2 emissions.
Indonesia's greenhouse gas emissions totaled 950 MtCO2eq and were among the largest
in the world in 2018 (Gütschow et al., 2016).
Figure 2
National Greenhouse Gas Emissions Chart
According to data from the 2021 Greenhouse Gas Inventory (GHG) and Monitoring,
Reporting, Verification (MPV) report prepared by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry
as shown in Figure 2 above, greenhouse gas contributors are dominated by four sectors, namely
energy, Industrial Process and Product Use (IPPU), agriculture, and waste. The energy sector
as the largest contributor of more than 60% mainly comes from the energy and transportation
industry which still depends on the use of fossil energy as the main fuel. The consequence of
Indonesia's dependence on fossil fuels is an increase in the National Budget for fuel subsidies
and an increase in CO2 emissions.
Fossil fuel use from motor vehicles is a major contributor to pollution and greenhouse
gases. Data shows that in Indonesia 90% of traffic activities are motorized vehicles (IESR,
-
500.000
1.000.000
1.500.000
2018 2019 2020
Emisi GRK Nasional
Energi IPPU Pertanian Limbah
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
693
2020). According to (I. C. Setiawan, 2019) 85% of total greenhouse gas emissions are
generated by motor vehicles, which include cars and motorcycles. The use of motorized
vehicles can cause negative externalities in the form of carbon emissions, air pollution,
congestion, and accidents (Kotchen et al., 2019).
Indonesia has committed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and move towards net zero
emissions by 2060. Indonesia's seriousness in mitigating climate change is the basis for the
government in formulating Indonesia's NDC (Nationally Determined Contributions). The
Indonesian government has integrated mitigation and adaptation elements to achieve the NDC
goal of reducing 31.89% of carbon emissions nationally and 43.20% with international
assistance by 2030 (Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia,
2022). The goal is to achieve a low-emission and climate-resilient Indonesia in the future.
The transportation sector consumes 428.61 million BOE (Barrel Oil Equivalent) or about
36.15% of the final energy consumption of 1,185.56 million BOE in 2022 (Ministry of Energy
and Mineral Resources, 2023). The high energy use in the transportation sector is reflected in
the number of vehicles in Indonesia that are still dominated by conventional vehicles (ICE),
namely 126 million motorcycle units, 19 million car units, and 7 million freight car units
(Perhubungan, 2023). It is known that the life cycle emissions of battery-based electric
motorized vehicles (KBLBB) are the lowest when compared to conventional vehicles.
Therefore, to support emission reduction, the government projects as many as 2 million units
of electric cars and 13 million units of electric motorcycles operating on the road by 2030 (V.
N. Setiawan, 2023). Furthermore, the government targets the production of 9 million units of
two-wheeled and three-wheeled electric motorcycles and 600 thousand units of electric cars
and electric buses by 2030 (Junida, 2023). It is expected that the use of 2 million electric cars
by 2030 will reduce fuel imports by 3 million kiloliters and reduce CO2 emissions by 6.42
million tons/year.
Three types of electric vehicles exist in many countries including Indonesia. First, a
Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) is a vehicle that uses an internal combustion engine (ICE) but
has electric power as a backup. Second, Plug Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) is a vehicle that
combines two types of engines at once, namely internal combustion engines and batteries.
Third, Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) is a vehicle that entirely uses electricity as an energy
source (Hendarmin et al., 2023).
One of the barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles in Indonesia is the high purchase
price (Sidabutar, 2020). The price of electric cars is mostly more than Rp. 600 million while
the price of conventional cars is mostly priced at less than Rp. 300 million (Santika, 2023).
Furthermore (Riyanto et al., 2019) explained that in general, battery-based electric cars (BEVs)
still have the highest total cost ownership (TCO) when compared to conventional vehicles
(ICE). According to (Tláskalová, 2021) to support the use of electric vehicles (EVs), it is
necessary to implement various incentive schemes and policies so that electric vehicles become
competitive with conventional vehicles. This is in line with the government which has
stipulated Presidential Regulation Number 55 of 2019 concerning the Acceleration of the
Battery Electric Vehicle Program for Road Transportation.
Article 17 of the Presidential Regulation mandates that the central government and local
governments can provide fiscal and non-fiscal incentives to encourage the transition of battery-
based electric vehicles in Indonesia, one of which is the subsidy policy of providing BBN KB
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
incentives to consumers. This policy provides BBN KB incentives for people who are
interested in buying battery-based electric vehicles. In total, this incentive reduces about 12.5%
of the selling price of battery-based electric vehicles. With these incentives, consumers will be
more interested in owning battery-based electric vehicles in Indonesia. Thus, in theory, the
demand curve will shift to the right. This leads to an increase in the quantity of demand for
battery-based electric vehicles. However, if people still do not have environmental awareness
and there is no policy to limit the use of conventional vehicles, the demand for battery-based
electric vehicles will be inelastic.
Indonesia is still very slow in advancing electric vehicles compared to other countries
(Yuniza, 2021). The population of electric vehicles in Indonesia has only reached 68 thousand
units or 0.04% of the total vehicles in Indonesia (Aszhari, n.d.).
Figure 3
Sales of 4-wheel Electric Vehicles in Indonesia
Source: Gaikindo 2023 "reprocessed"
Based on Figure 3, sales of electric vehicles in Indonesia from 2019 to May 2023
amounted to 37550 units of cars. Of this total, sales of battery-based electric cars (BEV) up to
May 2023 sales amounted to 15,783 units. Furthermore, based on data from the Korlantas Polri,
the number of electric car ownership in Indonesia amounted to 14881 units from January 2019
to May 2023. DKI Jakarta Province is the province that has the most battery-based electric cars,
and the province that does not have a registered electric car in North Maluku.
Figure 4
Battery Electric Vehicle Registration
Source: Korlantas Polri, 2023
3,10%
87,10%
2,00%
0,10%
0,50%
0,20%
2,10%
4,90%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
VEHICLE REGISTRATION 2019 TO AUGUST 2023
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
695
Furthermore, as shown in Figure 5, the ownership of battery-based electric vehicles on
Java Island is 87.1%, and the remaining 13% are on non-Java Island. The graph shows that the
distribution of ownership of battery-based electric vehicles in Indonesia is still centered on the
island of Java.
Many factors influence the decision to demand battery-based electric vehicles by
consumers, one of which is related to purchase costs and operating costs (Gnann et al., 2018).
The cost groups of purchase price and operating costs are captured by the concept of total cost
of ownership (Danielis et al., 2018). Total Cost Ownership has been defined as a purchasing
tool and philosophy, which aims to understand the true cost of purchasing a particular item
such as a car (Ellram, 1995). Total Cost Ownership is consumer-oriented which includes all
costs borne by vehicle users such as purchase price, fuel consumption, vehicle taxes,
maintenance, maintenance, repairs, depreciation, and so on (Danielis et al., 2019).
To reduce emissions, it is necessary to electrify the transportation sector using renewable
energy, namely electricity. The battery-based electric motor vehicle (KBLBB) policy is part of
the government's long-term efforts to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The battery-
based electric motor vehicle (KBLBB) policy was developed to reduce dependence on fossil
fuels in the transportation sector. Fiscal incentives provided in the form of exemption and
reduction of vehicle registration fees (BBN KB) are regulated by the governor regulations of
each local government. It is hoped that these incentives will be able to encourage demand for
battery-based electric motorized vehicles and have a positive impact on the electric vehicle
industry in Indonesia. However, ownership of battery-based electric vehicles, especially
electric cars in Indonesia, is still very low. The number of battery-based electric car
achievements is still far from the target set by the government of 400 thousand units by 2025
or a new battery-based electric car population of 3.95%. Therefore, the success of this policy
needs to be measured by analyzing the adoption of battery-based electric vehicles in Indonesia.
Research related to government policies and interventions in increasing motor vehicle
ownership has been conducted. Such as research conducted (Mannberg et al., 2014) on the
effect of congestion tax in Sweden on the purchase of tax-free ethanol cars found that the
imposition of congestion tax has a significant impact on the sale of ethanol-fueled cars in the
city of Stockholm. The positive impact can be seen from the increase in sales when ethanol car
purchases are incentivized by congestion tax exemptions. Another study also found that the
impact of fiscal incentives in the form of tonnage tax cuts and green vehicle acquisition taxes
had a significant effect on the adoption rate of green vehicles in Japan (Alhulail & Takeuchi,
2014).
In line with the above research, the purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of the
BBN KB incentive policy on the ownership of battery-based electric vehicles in Indonesia and
how much it affects the increase in ownership of battery-based electric vehicles in Indonesia.
It is hoped that this research will contribute to the novelty of methods and studies related to the
effect of fiscal incentive policies on the ownership of battery-based electric vehicles in
Indonesia. By utilizing the available secondary data, this study uses Moderated Regression
Analysis (MRA) with Pooled Ordinary Least Square (POLS) estimation techniques to estimate
the role of the BBNKB incentive policy variable. The use of BBNKB incentive interaction
variables in this study is expected to enrich the literature on evaluating the impact of fiscal
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
incentive policies in the form of tax exemptions and reductions. In addition, this research can
also be used as a reference for policymakers related to government strategic programs.
RESEARCH METHODS
In this study, the unit of analysis used is the type of vehicle in the form of conventional
or electric at the provincial level with secondary data obtained from various sources. The main
dependent variable is data on the number of ownership of conventional and electric motorized
vehicles from all provinces in Indonesia. The ownership data is obtained from the Korlantas
Polri. Furthermore, the control variable data is secondary data obtained from PT PLN Persero,
PT Pertamina, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS)
Google Trends, and other relevant sources. In detail, the data can be seen in the table below:
Table 1
Types and Sources of Data
No
Variable
Data Source
Unit
Reference
1
Share of Ownership of
Battery Electric Cars
(Ownership)
Korlantas Polri,
processed
Persen
(Tláskalová, 2021);
(Wee et al., 2018)
2
Accumulated number of
Charging infrastructure
(lnspklu)
Ministry of Energy
and Mineral
Resources, PLN
Persero
Unit
(Liu et al., 2021);
(Mpoi et al., 2023);
(Xue et al., 2021)
3
Total PDRB Per Capita
(lnpdrb_kap)
BPS, processed
rupiah
(Ruoso & Ribeiro,
2022); (Xue et al.,
2021)
4
Fuel Price (lnbbm)
Pertamina,
processed
rupiah
(Bushnell et al.,
2022); (Ruoso &
Ribeiro, 2022)
5
Total Household
Expenditure Per Capita
(lnpengel_kap)
BPS, processed
rupiah
Ruoso & Ribeiro,
2022; (Xue et al.,
2021)
6
Number of consumers who
find out / care about
electric cars (cons_awar)
Google Trend,
processed
Access
(McElgunn, 2018)
7
Inflation Rate (lninflasi)
BPS, processed
persen
(Nanaki, 2018);
(PEHLİVANOĞLU
& RİYANTİ, 2018)
8
Open Unemployment Rate
(lnunemploy_rate)
BPS, processed
person
(Haidar & Rojas,
2022)
Source: processed by the author (2023)
To process the data with an appropriate empirical model, these data were converted into
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
697
a panel data format. Furthermore, the units of analysis were grouped, to distinguish between
treated and untreated groups. January 2019 to December 2022 is the research period. Data in
2019 will be used as data before the BBN KB tax incentive policy is implemented. Meanwhile,
data from 2020 to 2022 is data after the policy is implemented.
The variables used in this study consist of dependent variables in the form of shares of
motor vehicle ownership. motor vehicle ownership is data on motor vehicles that have been
registered and determined by the Korlantas Polri per province, per month, and year. The use of
ownership/registration data as a dependent variable is in line with research conducted by
(Tláskalová, 2021) and (Wee et al., 2018). The use of registration is because this research
focuses on taxation, especially local taxes at the regional level. The concept of local tax is local
base so it follows where the vehicle is registered. Because it could be that the purchase is made
in region A but the use is in region B. Furthermore, 2019 for data before the policy, and 2020
to 2022 is data after the policy is implemented. Then the independent variables consist of
variables that are used as proxies for priority interventions in measuring ownership of battery-
based electric vehicles. Where the main independent variable is the dummy treatment of
conventional or electric vehicle types.
The independent variable in the study is a priority dummy variable that is determined
based on the type of vehicle whether battery-based electric vehicles or conventional vehicles.
Then, the moderating variable is the BBN KB incentive policy where the dummy will be worth
1 after the policy is implemented from 2020 to 2022 and will be worth 0 before the policy is
implemented, namely 2019. While proxies such as the number of charging facilities, GRDP
per capita, household expenditure per capita, fuel prices, inflation, unemployment rates, and
consumer awareness are used as independent control variables.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Descriptive Analysis
Descriptive statistics generally describe the development of ownership of conventional
4-wheeled motorized vehicles and battery-based electric motorized vehicles in Indonesia. This
is shown in the table below.
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics
Variable
Observasi
Mean
Std.Dev.
Min.
Max.
Tahun
3264
2020
1,1182
2019
2022
Id_prov
3264
17,5
9,8122
1
34
lnkepemilikan
3264
0,6966
0,8763
0
4,4647
lnspklu
3264
0,5956
1,0662
0
5,6204
lnpdrb_kap
3264
2,3323
0,5555
1,3815
5,7813
lnpengel_kap
3264
1,7010
0,3902
1,1916
3,8612
lnbbm
3264
9,2658
0,1565
9,1174
9,6881
cons_awar
3264
17,0089
14,8136
0
86,7500
lninflasi
3264
1,1262
0,1758
0
1,8687
lnunemploy_rate
3264
1,5227
0,3641
0,1989
2,3145
Source: processed, STATA 17 (2023)
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
Based on Table 2, the development of vehicle ownership can be seen from the market
share of the number of 4-wheeled motorized vehicle ownerships. The market share of vehicle
ownership (lnkepilikan) with the lowest value of 0 and the highest value of 4.46 was in DKI
Jakarta Province in 2019. The average market share value of vehicle ownership is 0.70.
Furthermore, in terms of control variables, we can see the condition of the number of charging
stations (lnspklu), PDRB per capita (lnpdrb_kap), household expenditure per capita
(lnpengel_kap), fuel price (lnbm), inflation (inflation), unemployment rate (lnunemploy_rate),
and consumer knowledge/concern (cons_awar).
The highest number of charging infrastructure (lnspklu) in Bali Province is 5.62 in 2022.
The average value of charging stations is 0.59. Then the lowest PDRB per capita value
(lnpdrb_kap) of 1.38 belongs to East Nusa Tenggara Province in 2019, and the highest is in
East Kalimantan Province at 5.78 in 2020. The average value of PDRB per capita is 2.33.
Meanwhile, for household expenditure per capita (lnpengel_kap), the lowest value of 1.19 was
owned by East Nusa Tenggara Province in 2020, and the highest was in East Kalimantan
Province at 3.86 in 2020. While the average value of household expenditure per capita
(lnpengel_kap) is 1.70.
Then for the fuel price variable (lnbbm), the average value is 9.26. The lowest fuel price
was 9.11 and the highest was 9.69 in 2022. Furthermore, for the value of consumer
knowledge/concern (cons_awar), the lowest is 0, and the highest is owned by East Java
Province 87.25 in 2022 with an average value of 17. The next variable is inflation (inflation)
where the lowest value of 0 was in North Sulawesi province in 2019. The highest inflation
value was 1.86 in 2022 in West Sumatra province and the lowest was 0 in Papua province. The
average inflation rate is 1.12. For the next unemployment rate (lnunemploy_rate) the highest
was 2.31 in Riau Islands province in 2021, while the lowest was 0.19 in 2019 in DKI Jakarta
province. The average unemployment rate is 1.52.
Motor Vehicle Ownership in Indonesia
Indonesian motor vehicle ownership is still dominated by conventional vehicles.
However, after the battery-based electric vehicle policy began to increase.
Figure 5
Trend in Total Vehicle Ownership Share
Source: processed, STATA 17 (2023)
As Figure 5 shows, before the existence of the BBN KB incentive policy, the number of vehicle
ownership between battery-based electric vehicles and conventional vehicles had the same trend from
2019 to 2020. Then, there was a significant increase in the number of vehicle ownership in Indonesia
from 2020 to 2021, where 2020 was the time when the policy was implemented. The number of vehicle
owners for vehicle types that receive BBN KB incentives shows a better growth trend and tends to
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
699
increase. This is in line with demand theory (Pindyck & Rubinfeld, 2014) that the quantity of demand
for a good will change if there are factors that influence it, such as the provision of BBN KB
subsidies/incentives. Meanwhile, vehicle types that do not receive incentives experience stagnant
growth. In this case, for the unit of analysis that does not receive incentives, the trend in the number of
vehicle ownership does not seem to have increased either before the policy or after the policy.
Furthermore, a robustness test is also carried out to further ensure that the assumptions of the
OLS interaction model estimation in the analysis of the effect of the BBN KB incentive policy are met.
To test this assumption, a new group variable (treatment) is created with a random value for all units of
analysis. Furthermore, the variable that has a random value is regressed on the OLS interaction model.
Table 3
Robustness Test Results
Variables
Ownership
Ownership
treat
-0.716***
(0.0577)
time
0.0216
0.106***
(0.0471)
(0.0355)
teatime
0.171**
(0.0666)
treat new
-0.159
(0.393)
treatime2
0.181
(0.439)
Constant
0.974***
0.617***
(0.0408)
(0.0307)
Observations
3,264
3,264
R-squared
0.117
0.003
Standard errors in parentheses
*** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1
Source: processed, STATA 17 (2023)
Based on Table 3, the results of the robustness test show that the treatime2 interaction
variable has analysis results that have no significant effect. Thus it can be concluded that the
model can be applied to estimate the effect of the BBN KB incentive policy on increasing
ownership of battery-based electric motorized vehicles. This means that the results of empirical
panel data processing and testing can produce fairly strong policy analysis findings.
Estimation Results
This research initially wanted to see the causal inference between the provision of the
BBN KB incentive policy and the level of ownership of battery-based electric vehicles in
Indonesia using the staggered DiD model. However, due to limited access to data related to the
variation of provinces implementing the policy, this study cannot see the impact of the causal
inference relationship. Therefore, this study aims to identify the effect of policies on the growth
of battery-based electric vehicle ownership in Indonesia. By using the sample data that has
been obtained and grouping the units of analysis, an analysis will be carried out regarding the
effect of the BBN KB incentive on the growth of ownership of battery-based electric motor
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
vehicles throughout Indonesia, Java, and non-Java using the OLS interaction regression model.
Where the results focus on the treatment variable which is the interaction between the treatment
dummy and the time dummy in this study.
Data Analysis Results for All Provinces in Indonesia
The results of panel data analysis in 34 provinces in Indonesia from 2019 to 2022 using
the OLS interaction model can be described in Table 4 as follows.
Table 4
Estimation Results of the OLS Interaction Model
Variables
Without Control Variables
Control
Variables
Ownership
Ownership
treat
-0.716***
-0.716***
(0.0577)
(0.129)
time
0.0216
0.0295
(0.0471)
(0.0611)
teatime
0.171**
0.171*
(0.0666)
(0.0936)
lnspklu_akm
No
0.111*
(0.0630)
lnpdrb_kap
No
-0.133
(0.154)
pengel_kap
No
0.158
(0.170)
lobby
No
-0.217*
(0.118)
cons_awar
No
0.000780*
(0.000391)
lninflasi
No
0.00835
(0.00691)
lnunemply_rate
No
-0.293**
(0.130)
i.provinsi
No
Yes
i.tahun
No
Yes
Cluster province
No
Yes
Constant
0.974***
3.143**
(0.0408)
(1.186)
Observations
3,264
3,264
R-squared
0.117
0.859
Standard errors in parentheses
*** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1
Source: processed, STATA 17 (2023)
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
701
As the results of the analysis in Table 4 above, it can be seen that according to column 1
in the absence of control variables and the addition of fixed effects of province and year, the
variable treatment illustrates a positive and significant value. The coefficient number on the
teatime variable shows a result of 0.171. These results explain that when the policy is
implemented, it will increase the number of owners of battery-based electric motor vehicles
(electric cars) by 17.1% with a significance level of 5%. Furthermore, if the test is carried out
with the addition of control variables and fixed effects on the province and year variables as in
column 2, it will produce the same or consistent coefficient value. The positive and significant
findings are in line with (Wee et al., 2018) and (Tláskalová, 2021). Both studies state that tax
incentives significantly affect the growth of electric vehicle registrations by 5% - 11% in the
United States and increased sales of battery-based electric vehicles in Europe. Then the findings
of significant results are in line with (Riley, 2023) which states that government incentives, in
the form of tax credits or rebates, can make electric cars more affordable for consumers and
increase demand.
Meanwhile, in terms of control variables, the variable number of charging infrastructure
(lnspklu_akm) has a positive and significant coefficient. This suggests that if the availability
of charging stations increases, it can make EVs more attractive to consumers, leading to higher
demand (Riley, 2023). This result is consistent with (Narasimhan & Johnson, 2018); (Liu et
al., 2021); and (Mpoi et al., 2023) found that the availability of charging infrastructure will
have a positive impact on consumer interest in owning an electric vehicle. Then, the consumer
care variable (cons_awar) produces a positive and significant coefficient value on the number
of ownership of electric motorized vehicles. This means that the more consumers or people
who care about battery-based electric vehicles find out the benefits and advantages either
through social media, YouTube, Google, or directly to electric vehicle dealers, it will have an
impact on the growing number of ownership of battery-based electric vehicles. This is in line
with the findings of (McElgunn, 2018), which show a significant positive correlation between
consumer knowledge/concern and electric vehicle purchasing patterns.
Furthermore, the open unemployment rate variable (lnunemply_rate) has a negative and
significant coefficient. This result explains that the higher the unemployment rate in a province,
it will have a decreasing impact on the number of battery-based electric vehicle owners. These
findings are in line with (Haidar & Rojas, 2022) who found that the unemployment rate hurts
electric vehicle sales. This is related to income, where buying a battery-based electric vehicle
requires a fixed income due to the high price of electric vehicles. Other control variables such
as GRDP per capita and expenditure per capita do not show significance at the 1%, 5%, or 10%
level. However, GRDP per capita has a negative coefficient, meaning that declining income
from groups such as private companies and the government has an impact on reducing the
number of battery-based electric vehicle owners. While per capita expenditure has a positive
value, this indicates that if individual / community income rises, it affects increasing the
number of battery-based electric vehicle ownership.
The next control variable is fuel oil (lobby), the coefficient value shows a negative and
significant result. This means that the price of fuel has a decreasing impact on the number of
owners of battery-based electric vehicles. This could happen in Indonesia considering that the
price of electric vehicles is still high so people respond to rising fuel prices by continuing to
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
buy conventional vehicles that tend to be more affordable and fuel-efficient. This result is
different from (Bushnell et al., 2022) and (Ruoso & Ribeiro, 2022) who found that fuel prices
have a positive and significant impact on driving electric vehicle adoption. Meanwhile, the
inflation variable depicts a positive but insignificant result. This suggests that the inflation rate
does not have an impact on driving the number of battery electric vehicle ownership.
Results of Data Analysis in Java and Non-Java Islands
To find out the differences in the results of the analysis of the effect of the BBN KB
incentive policy between non-Java Island and Java Island, the analysis will be carried out as
shown in Table 6 below:
Table 5
Results of OLS interaction model in Java Island and Non-Java Island
Variables
Without Control Variables
Control Variables
Java ownership
ownership
nonjava
Description
Java
ownership
nonjava
treat
-1.326***
-0.586***
-1.326*
-0.586***
(0.205)
(0.0358)
(0.591)
(0.0854)
time
-0.0150
0.0295
0.222
0.109***
(0.167)
(0.0293)
(0.554)
(0.0258)
teatime
0.874***
0.0199
0.874*
0.0199
(0.237)
(0.0414)
(0.415)
(0.0379)
lnspklu_akm
No
No
Yes
Yes
lnpdrb_kap
No
No
Yes
Yes
pengel_kap
No
No
Yes
Yes
lobby
No
No
Yes
Yes
cons_awar
No
No
Yes
Yes
lninflasi
No
No
Yes
Yes
lnunemply_rate
No
No
Yes
Yes
i.provinsi
No
No
Yes
Yes
i.tahun
No
No
Yes
Yes
Cluster province
No
No
Yes
Yes
Constant
2.070***
0.740***
15.28***
0.807
(0.145)
(0.0253)
(3.142)
(0.492)
Observations
576
2,688
576
2,688
R-squared
0.108
0.275
0.806
0.840
Standard errors in parentheses
*** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1
Source: processed, STATA 17 (2023)
Based on the results of the analysis that has been done above, there is a difference in the
level of significance between Java Island and non-Java Island. The island of Java shows results
with a positive and significant coefficient value. The estimated result on the treatment variable
coefficient is 0.874. This explains that the provision of BBN KB incentives increases the
number of ownership of battery-based electric car-type vehicles by 87.4% on the island of Java
with a significance level of 1%.
Then in non-Java Island, the estimation of the coefficient value of the treatment variable
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
703
produces a positive and insignificant coefficient value. This result shows that the provision of
BBN KB incentives does not have a significant impact on the number of ownership of battery-
based electric car vehicle types in non-Java Island when the policy is implemented. After that,
testing was carried out with the addition of control variables and fixed effects on province and
year variables. The results obtained illustrate relatively similar and consistent estimates for
both Java Island and non-Java Island, only the level of significance is different.
The difference in the results of the role of BBN KB incentives on ownership of battery-
based electric vehicles on Java Island and non-Java Island can be caused by various factors.
Some of the factors driving demand for electric vehicles include the availability of charging
infrastructure (SPKLU) on the island of Java when compared to non-Java islands.
Figure 6
Number of SPKLUs in Indonesia by April 2023
Source: Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, processed by the author
Figure 6 shows that almost 50% of the total charging infrastructure (SPKLU) in
Indonesia is located on the island of Java. The remainder is distributed across non-Java islands,
with the most on the island of Bali, then Sumatra, Sulawesi, and the lowest on the island of
Papua. Furthermore, there are other privileges on the island of Java for battery-based electric
vehicles, namely odd-even free and the availability of maintenance workshops. Therefore, the
existence of supporting infrastructure for battery-based electric vehicles and various privileges
obtained causes electric cars to become more attractive so it has an impact on increasing
demand for electric cars, especially on the island of Java.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the analysis of the effect of BBN KB incentives on the growth of
ownership of battery-based electric vehicles with OLS interaction model panel data, it shows
that there is a positive and significant effect of providing BBN KB incentives on battery-based
electric vehicles on the number of ownership of battery-based electric vehicles in Indonesia.
Since the policy was implemented, the number of battery-based electric cars has continued to
increase. The impact of BBN KB incentives has an influence on the increase in the number of
ownership of battery-based electric vehicles by 17.1%. Furthermore, there is heterogeneity in
the impact by island where the BBN KB incentive has a positive and significant effect on
increasing ownership of battery-based electric vehicles by 87.4% in Java, while in non-Java
the BBN KB incentive policy does not have a significant effect on battery-based electric vehicle
ownership. The addition of control variables produces the same and consistent estimation value
in all provinces, Java Island and non-Java Island, only the significance level is different.
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
Meanwhile, the number of charging infrastructure (SPKLU), consumer awareness, fuel
price, and open unemployment rate have a significant influence on ownership of battery-based
electric motorized vehicles. All of these variables are demand-supporting factors so consumers
are interested in adopting electric vehicles.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Affairs, U. N. . D. of E. and S. (2022). The Sustainable Development Goals: Report 2022. UN.
Alhulail, I., & Takeuchi, K. (2014). Effects of tax incentives on sales of eco-friendly vehicles:
evidence from Japan. Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University Japan.
Aszhari, A. (n.d.). Populasi Kendaraan Listrik di Indonesia Baru 68 Ribu Unit. Liputan6.Com.
https://www.liputan6.com/otomotif/read/5407702/populasi-kendaraan-listrik-di-
indonesia-baru-68-ribu-unit?page=2
Bushnell, J. B., Muehlegger, E., & Rapson, D. S. (2022). Energy prices and electric vehicle
adoption. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Danielis, R., Giansoldati, M., & Rotaris, L. (2018). A probabilistic total cost of ownership
model to evaluate the current and prospects of electric cars uptake in Italy. Energy Policy,
119, 268281.
Danielis, R., Giansoldati, M., & Scorrano, M. (2019). Consumer and Society Oriented Cost of
Ownership of Electric and Conventional Cars in Italy. Società Italiana di Economia dei
Trasporti e della Logistica (SIET).
Ellram, L. M. (1995). Total cost of ownership: an analysis approach for purchasing.
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 25(8), 423.
Gnann, T., Stephens, T. S., Lin, Z., Plötz, P., Liu, C., & Brokate, J. (2018). What drives the
market for plug-in electric vehicles?-A review of international PEV market diffusion
models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93, 158164.
Gütschow, J., Jeffery, M. L., Gieseke, R., Gebel, R., Stevens, D., Krapp, M., & Rocha, M.
(2016). The PRIMAP-hist national historical emissions time series. Earth System Science
Data, 8(2), 571603.
Haidar, B., & Rojas, M. T. A. (2022). The relationship between public charging infrastructure
deployment and other socio-economic factors and electric vehicle adoption in France.
Research in Transportation Economics, 95, 101208.
Hendarmin, D. W., Hanifi, R., & Naubnome, V. (2023). Perancangan Struktur Mobil Listrik
“JETZ” dan Analisis Statik Menggunakan Fea (Finite Element Analysis)”. Mutiara:
Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal, 1(10), 526531.
IESR. (2020). The Role of Electric Vehicles in Decarbonizing Indonesia’s Road Transport
Sector. Institute for Essential Services Reform (IESR). https://iesr.or.id/wp-
content/uploads/2020/04/The-Role-of-EV-in-Decarbonizing-Road-Transport-Sector-in-
Indonesia_Final.pdf
Junida, A. I. (2023). Kemenperin kebut target pengembangan ekosistem kendaraan listrik
2030. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3781830/kemenperin-kebut-
targetpengembangan-ekosistem-kendaraan-listrik-2030
Kotchen, M. J., Stock, J. H., & Wolfram, C. D. (2019). Introduction to" Environmental and
Energy Policy and the Economy". NBER Chapters, 37.
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
705
Liu, X., Sun, X., Zheng, H., & Huang, D. (2021). Do policy incentives drive electric vehicle
adoption? Evidence from China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,
150, 4962.
Mannberg, A., Jansson, J., Pettersson, T., Brännlund, R., & Lindgren, U. (2014). Do tax
incentives affect households׳ adoption of ‘green ’cars? A panel study of the Stockholm
congestion tax. Energy Policy, 74, 286299.
McElgunn, J. (2018). Consumer Awareness of Electric Vehicles and Global Purchasing
Patterns.
Mpoi, G., Milioti, C., & Mitropoulos, L. (2023). Factors and incentives that affect electric
vehicle adoption in Greece. International Journal of Transportation Science and
Technology.
Nanaki, E. A. (2018). Measuring the impact of the economic crisis on the Greek Vehicle
Market. Sustainability, 10(2), 510.
Organization, W. M. (2022). Climate and weather extremes in 2022 show the need for more
action. https://public.wmo.int/En/Media/News/Climate-and-Weather-Extremes-2022-
Show-Need-More-Action.
PEHLİVANOĞLU, F., & RİYANTİ, R. (2018). Macroeconomic effect on automobile sales in
the top four automobile production countries. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler
Dergisi, 35, 139161.
Perhubungan, B. K. T. K. (2023). Skema Phase Out Kendaraan Internal Combustion Engine
Menuju Battery Electric Vehicle. https://baketrans.dephub.go.id/imut/skema-phase-out-
kendaraan
Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2014). Mikroekonomi (Novietha I. Sallama. Penerbit
Erlangga.
Riley, G. (2023). Price elasticity of demand - Tesla cuts prices by up to a fifth to boost demand.
https://www.tutor2u.net/Economics/Blog/Price-Elasticity-of-Demand-Tesla-Cuts-Prices-
by-up-to-a-Fifth-to-Boost-Demand.
Riyanto, R., Riyadi, S. A., Nuryakin, C., & Massie, N. W. G. (2019). Estimating the total cost
of ownership (TCO) of electrified vehicles in Indonesia. 2019 6th International
Conference on Electric Vehicular Technology (ICEVT), 8899.
Ruoso, A. C., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2022). The influence of countries’ socioeconomic
characteristics on the adoption of electric vehicles. Energy for Sustainable Development,
71, 251262.
Santika, E. F. (2023). Harga Mahal hingga Masalah Pengisian Baterai, Ini Kendala Adopsi
Kendaraan Listrik di Indonesia. Katadata. Co.Id.
https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/05/29/harga-mahal-hingga-masalah-
pengisian-baterai-ini-kendala-adopsi-kendaraan-listrik-di-indonesia
Setiawan, I. C. (2019). Reducing CO2 Emissions from Land Transport Sector in Indonesia:
Case Study Automobiles Sector. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1167(1), 12008.
Setiawan, V. N. (2023). ESDM Ramal 13 Juta Motor Listrik Bakal Penuhi Jalanan RI.
https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20230912173533-4-471869/esdm-ramal-13-
jutamotor-listrik-bakal-penuhi-jalanan-ri
Sidabutar, V. T. P. (2020). Kajian pengembangan kendaraan listrik di Indonesia: prospek dan
hambatannya. Jurnal Paradigma Ekonomika, 15(1), 2138.
Vol 3, No 2 February 2024
Does The BBN KB Incentive Policy Increase Ownership Of
Battery-Based Electric Vehicles? Indonesia Case Study
https://jetbis.al-makkipublisher.com/index.php/al/index
Tláskalová, A. (2021). The Impact of Incentives on Electric Vehicle Sales in the European
Union. July 26, 2021. Charles University, Faculty Of Social Sciences.
https://dspace.cuni.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.11956/150215/120398618.pdf?sequence
=1
Wee, S., Coffman, M., & La Croix, S. (2018). Do electric vehicle incentives matter? Evidence
from the 50 US states. Research Policy, 47(9), 16011610.
Xue, C., Zhou, H., Wu, Q., Wu, X., & Xu, X. (2021). Impact of incentive policies and other
socio-economic factors on electric vehicle market share: A panel data analysis from the
20 countries. Sustainability, 13(5), 2928.
Yuniza, M. E. (2021). Indonesia incentive policies on electric vehicles: the questionable effort
from the government. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.
licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License